(The Associated Press circulated the following article on January 15.)
WASHINGTON — The Pacific Surfliner, running from San Luis Obispo, Calif., down the coast to San Diego, is Amtrak’s second-most popular route, with nearly 2.7 million passengers last year.
But one thing sets it apart from most other trains run by the federally funded passenger railroad: It’s paid for by the state of California.
California is among 14 states that fund corridor service that Amtrak wouldn’t otherwise provide. On Tuesday, Sens. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J., and Trent Lott, R-Miss., are expected to announce the introduction of legislation that would, among other things, encourage more state investment in Amtrak by making federal matching funds available.
The sweeping bill – similar to one that passed in the Senate 93 to 6 last year but was never voted on in the House – calls for $12 billion in federal funding for the next six years. Many Amtrak supporters believe it has a better chance this year with Democrats in control of Congress.
But one aspect of the bill is relatively uncontroversial. The idea of matching funds for state investment in Amtrak is one that both supporters and critics of the railroad have embraced – and something states like California believe is long overdue.
As for Amtrak itself, “states are our future,” President Alex Kummant told The Associated Press last week. He said a matching program for capital investments, along with making Amtrak “more user-friendly” for states, is essential if Amtrak is to capitalize on growing demand for intercity rail.
Even without such matching funds, states have been stepping up. The biggest player, California, currently contributes $73 million for the Pacific Surfliner and two other trains it runs jointly with Amtrak.
Other states that subsidize Amtrak service are Maine, Michigan, Missouri, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin.
The Lautenberg-Lott legislation would allow states to fund capital rail projects with up to 80 percent federal funds. States would continue to pay operating costs, but their arrangements with Amtrak would become more standardized. Currently, each state operates under separately negotiated agreements.
“If the federal government wants to get out of the operating business, this seems to me a reasonable way to do it,” said Will Kempton, director of the California Department of Transportation.
Kempton said any legislation that is passed should take into account past investments by states, so that those that did step up to fund Amtrak are not penalized.